Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content

The Art of Gardens in Maurice Scève’s Microcosme

 

Contrasts

The segment on gardens presents half-a-dozen pairs of opposites. 19Sillons, i.e., furrows contrast with the adjective, recouverts, covered up. This first oxymoron comes from the realm of agriculture. A second, semantically related to the first, such pair pits promenoirs, alleys in the open, and the tree-covered alleys conveyed by berceaux voutoyés: it refers to garden architecture with its geometrical design, since the two types of alleys cross one another. The third set of contrasting terms occurs with the two adjectives denoting plants belonging either to the native (endogenous) variety, communes, or to the imported (exogenous) type, satives. It is intermingled with the contrast between grasses (herbes) and flowers (fleurs), an opposition between wild and domesticated types, both bringing in botany.   Hydraulics come in with water either coming down under gravity (conduire en pente) or being pumped upwards (remonter). The final contrast I wish to underline is the complementarity, in the typical Renaissance garden, between the decorative elements (parterres for instance) and the plot for growing vegetables, alluded to by the terms plaisance (agreement) and service (utility).

Each such pair thus refers to a distinct component of the Renaissance garden, in its make-up. I will proceed with sensory perceptions of the various types, an investigation congenial to Scève’s priorities in his art.20

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Published inMy reviews