Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content

language as an analogy in the natural sciences

2. Building a molecule

The complementary standard activity of chemists is synthesis. We make molecules. We build both natural substances and artificial products. There are many reasons and many aspects to such synthetic endeavor. Chemistry is both a science and an industry. Advancement of knowledge demands that we devise all sorts of new and crazy structures, molecules in the shape of knots, molecules in the shape of the Platonic solids, molecules in the shape of dendrimers or footballs, etc. The pharmaceutical industry has a voracious need for synthesizing rare but biologically active natural products as antitumorals, antihypertensors, antiretrovirals, insect antifeedants, etc. As a rule, such molecules stem from plants and they desport complex and delicate architectures, demanding exquisite skill in their step-by-step construction. Not only do we need to duplicate the natural construct, in order to make it abundant, we also synthesize hundreds of variants in order to try and improve potency as a drug while reducing undesirable side effects.

There is no need to elaborate further here about the need for synthesis. let me only say that the activity, like that of structural analysis, occupies the core of chemical science. The everyday practice of chemists in performing the multi-stage synthesis of a complex molecule assembles parts or modules, near-identical to those involved in (and identified by) the structural determination.

This buildup process is akin to word and sentence construction from the units of speech.

Historical reminder

The ethanol molecule (alcohol) had its elemental composition established early in the XIXth century. It was shown as equivalent to the sum of an ethylene molecule and a water molecule. And indeed, it proved feasible soon thereafter to synthesize ethanol by adding water to ethylene. This continues also to be one of its industrial preparations.

However, from the standpoint of chemical thought, equating for synthesis’ sake a molecule to the sum of another two stable, existing molecules is sterile. Productive, fruitful thought does not consider ethanol as C2H6O = C2H4 + H2O, but as C2H5OH, i.e. as the union of the two radicals ethyl C2H5 and hydroxy OH. Why is it productive? Because these two units alone account also for other molecules, (C2H5)2 (butane) and (OH)2 (hydrogen peroxide).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Published inScience writings